I will attach the student’s presentation on harm reduction and here are the inst

I will attach the student’s presentation on harm reduction and here are the instructions from the professor. this class is ethics on public health major
Essay Assignment:
We covered many topics in this class and there are multiple viewpoints, depending on one’s philosophical point of view. In a one to two-page reaction paper, talk about one of your classmate’s opposing views. What did that individual’s argument make you think about your own point of view?
Instructions to be used while addressing the questions above:
Your paper must be a minimum of one (1) FULL page in length. That means don’t give me ¼ of a page with your name, etc. on it – use a cover page instead to record that information. I was a student too, I’m all too aware of that old trick. We’ve been doing that since the time of dot-matrix printers (my parents probably did that with typewriters…)
You must use size twelve (12) Times New Roman font; margins be set to one (1) inch all around. See note above.
Paragraphs are to be double spaced, without a space between paragraphs of the same style. See note above.
The paper must be proof read. Multiple typos and misspellings will result in a zero.
Your paper must comply with the APA Manual of Style, Sixth (6th) Edition, to include properly formatted in text citations and works cited page. Abstract and methodology, research, etc. section headings are not required.
Refer to the rubric on the next page to see what I’ll be looking for when I grade your assignment. Type accordingly.

Compliance with Labor Laws In Chapter 20, your textbook discusses different Labo

Compliance with Labor Laws
In Chapter 20, your textbook discusses different Labor Laws. In Health Information Management, it is important to understand local, state, and federal regulations regarding labor so compliance can be achieved. Read through the chapter and do a google search for local and state labor law.
Analyze the scenario below and describe the labor law violations you identify and justify why you believe each one is a violation citing the labor law.
Scenario
Joseph Mann is a Level III Coder at St. Andrew’s General Hospital. He has been a coder for the past 10 years and has requested a new keyboard tray due to the development of carpal tunnel. His supervisor evaluated the request and denied due to budgetary constraints. He was advised not to go to Employee Health because if they found him to have an injury, he might not be able work resulting in job loss. However, he was informed that he is welcome to purchase and install any new keyboard tray he would like to have.
Joseph waited until payday and went to the local office supply store to purchase a new ergonomic keyboard tray. When he evaluated his paycheck, he was happy to see that he had been paid for 88 hours regular time. The extra 8 hours of regular paid for the new keyboard and tray. Overtime is not allowed, but sneaking in a few extra hours of work without overtime pay is always encouraged for nonexempt employees at St. Andrew’s. Joseph always tries to work a little extra.
*Do not forget to cite your sources.
350-word count minimum.
Please do not copy and paste from the internet. This assignment should be your thoughts, ideas, and words. Sources should supplement your assignment; they are not meant to be the entire assignment.

Final Essay Examination, due online via Blackboard by 11:59pm Friday 6 May 2022

Final Essay Examination, due online via Blackboard by 11:59pm Friday 6 May 2022 PH103 Ethics
Fisher College, Spring term 2022 Eric Michael Dale, PhD
Preliminaries:
1. Type or paste your answers in the Blackboard text submission box, or upload your exam as a .wpd,
.doc, .docx, or .pdf using the Blackboard upload system.
2. If you simply upload a file I have to download and open, I will delete it.
3. If you attach an Apple pages or Google docs link or file, I will delete it.
4. SafeAssign, our plagiarism software, has to be able to read your submission before I read it.
5. Is there a SafeAssign Submission report after your submission? If not, you will fail your assignment.
6. If SafeAssign can’t read it, I won’t read it, and you haven’t submitted your work.
7. If I have to download it, I won’t read it, and you haven’t submitted your work.
8. This exam is given on the honor code: you cannot work together on it. This is ethics – practice some.
9. All answers should be typed, double or single spaced, with reasonable margins, and 10, 11, or 12 font.
10. If you Google to get your answers, I can Google to get your answers, too. Don’t do this.
Please follow ALL of these instructions:
1. This exam is given on the honor code: you cannot work together on it. This is ethics – practice some.
2. All answers should be double or single spaced, with reasonable margins, and 10, 11, or 12 font.
3. If you Google to get your answers, I can Google to get your answers, too. Don’t do this.
4. Use our textbook, class notes, the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (http://plato.stanford.edu/), the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (https://www.iep.utm.edu/), whatever you need. You don’t have to use outside sources, but you may. “A” quality work uses, cites, and analyzes multiple sources in the field.
5. Do NOT plagiarize. If you use outside quotes etc., cite them clearly. If you need help citing your work, Purdue University has a helpful guide: (https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/02/)
Below, you fill find ten questions. Pick two questions and write 600-800 words on each question you’ve chosen to answer; two short essays in total. You may write more. You may not write less.
************************************************************************************ PT = Pojman & Tramel textbook
1. Are genuine egoists rare, as James Rachels claims (PT pp.86-93)? Is it a fact that most people care about others, even people they don’t know? Discuss.
2. Some philosophers have disagreed with David Hume, and said that, for example, arguing from facts to values isn’t always a mistake. What sorts of values might follow from facts? For example, what about John Stuart Mill’s argument that if something is desired, then it is desirable (PT pp.158-163)? Discuss.
3. Johnathan Bennett, using the example of Huckleberry Finn, says that often our moral sympathies are more important than our moral principles (PT pp.339-347). Does Bennett think principles play an
important role in moral life? Should one’s principles overrule one’s sympathies? Discuss.
4. Is it possible for everyone in our society to achieve eudaimonia, as Aristotle explains it (PT pp.301- 311)? If not, who cannot achieve eudaimonia, and why not? Discuss.
5. According to James Rachels, belief in God is incompatible with morality because no being is worthy or worship, since for a human to worship anything is beneath human dignity. As Rachels puts it, “worship
requires the abandonment of one’s role as an autonomous moral agent” (PT p.373). This is a bad argument about religion – is it a bad argument about ethics? Discuss.
6. In The Republic, Socrates rejects Thrasymachus’s argument that justice should be what the strong decide (PT pp.3-18). The question we face from this argument is, “Why be moral if I will not benefit?” or the even harder question, “Why be moral if I will suffer from it?”
7. What moral value, if any, does suffering have? Nietzsche says that suffering is required for a heroic human will to power, because only suffering can make us strong or crush us (PT pp.123-130). Is he right? And how far down the road to you want to go with this? What about rape, or childhood cancer, or random violence of any sort? Do we really want to say that they have a moral value to us? If not, where do we draw the line at the value of suffering? Or perhaps there is nothing moral about suffering at all?
8. Plato’s Allegory of the Cave (PT pp.114-119) suggests that, unlike Hobbes or Nietzsche, Plato thinks that values like goodness, justice, and morality are objective realities. We do not decide what is good and moral, we discover what is good. We become good by knowing what the good is; and for Plato, this means looking beyond the changeable and impermanent way things seem and contemplating them in their eternal perfection. Are ethics human constructions? If so, how can we ever come to agreement on morals? If they are not, how can we know the good and then become good?
9. Is ethics primarily a matter of personal morality or social morality? If personal, how do you incorporate the social? If social, how do you incorporate the personal? Note that I am not asking “is ethics a matter of personal choice” – we know that it is not. It is social, communal, personal, all together. This question asks, how do you incorporate the social and the personal? Use at least one of the thinkers we’ve discussed this semester to support your answer.
10. Against Utilitarians like Mill, Nozick argues that there are things that count morally for us which are greater than pleasure or happiness. That is, we are not, in fact, driven primarily by our desire for happiness and our hopes to avoid unhappiness. He argues this in his classic experience machine thought experiment (PT pp.141-42). Rather than assessing the obvious question, namely, would you plug into the machine?, let’s approach this from another direction. We know that Nozick’s argument isn’t
hedonistic; is Nozick’s argument egoistic? That is, do we refuse the experience machine because it’s
wrong to plug in, or because it’s not good for me?

Select a case study from Spinello, chapters 3-6 (limit yourself to only one case

Select a case study from Spinello, chapters 3-6 (limit yourself to only one case study). Identify the main ethical concerns at stake in the case, and argue on behalf of one side or the other of the debate. Be sure to consider possible objections to your argument and respond to them.

Ethics Position Essay Examination, due online via Blackboard by 11:59pm Friday 6

Ethics Position Essay Examination, due online via Blackboard by 11:59pm Friday 6 May 2022 PH103 Ethics
Fisher College, Spring term 2022 Eric Michael Dale, PhD
Please follow ALL of these instructions:
1. Type and paste your submission into the Blackboard text submission box, or upload your exam as a .wpd, .doc, .docx, or
.pdf using the Blackboard upload system.
2. If you simply upload a file I have to download and open, I will delete it.
3. If you attach an Apple pages or Google docs link or file, I will delete it.
4. SafeAssign, our plagiarism software, has to be able to read your submission before I read it.
5. Can you see a SafeAssign Submission report after your submission? If you can’t, you are about the fail your assignment.
6. If SafeAssign can’t read it, I won’t read it, and you haven’t submitted your work.
7. If I have to download it, I won’t read it, and you haven’t submitted your work.
8. This exam is being given on the honor code: you cannot work together on it. This is ethics – practice some.
9. All answers should be typed, double or single spaced, with reasonable margins, and 10, 11, or 12 font.
10. If you Google to get your answers, I can Google to get your answers, too. Don’t do this.
**************************************************************************************************
1. Final Position Essay Question: We studied a lot of ethical theories this semester, and had a lot of discussion of how they should be applied with various issues. As we read them and discussed them, one of them stood out to you – perhaps Kant, perhaps some form of egoism, maybe the social contract, or utilitarianism, maybe one of the others. This final position essay is like the first one we had at the beginning of the term, but now I want you to apply what you’ve learned.
Which one of the approaches to ethics we’ve studied this semester (Kant, Utilitarian, Aristotle, etc.) seems to you to be the right one? Why? What makes it superior to the others? Use one of the following issues to argue in favor of your position. In other words, how does your chosen ethic (Kant, Mill, Aristotle etc.) give the best ethical answer to one of the following topics?:
1. Should I cheat on this exam?
2. If something is legal, does that make it moral?
3. You find $50 on an empty bus seat. No one else is near the empty seat. What should you do?
4. Julia’s best friend has turned against her and is now organizing other girls to bully and isolate her. What can Julia do?
5. Is reporting wrongdoing an act of heroism or betrayal?
Remember, I want you to use the ethics we’ve studied this semester to answer these questions. I don’t care about your personal opinions; I do care about your thoughtful analysis.
Write one essay of approx. 600-800 words (with MSWord, go to Review -> Word Count to see how many you’ve got).
This exam will give you the chance to think on your own about the importance of ethics. It isn’t the sort of exam you could write from your notes alone – you’ll have to sit down and think about this.
I have enjoyed the term and I look forward to reading your answers.

Get 15% Discount When you Order Assignments From Us.

X